Legal Opinion

Rose v. Mayor of Thunderbolt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1952No. 34236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

By the terms of Section 34 of the Act of 1921 (Ga. L. 1921, pp. 1122, 1140), “Any person who has been convicted in the said Mayor’s Court and on appeal to the Mayor and Aldermen of the Town of Thunderbolt, the conviction has been affirmed, such defendant may, by giving notice of an intention to certiorari, suspend the judgment and be released from custody at once, upon giving the usual certiorari bond with security in such sum as may be fixed by the Mayor, or the Mayor pro tern., for his appearance; provided, that the certiorari from the said Mayor and Aldermen shall be sued out within thirty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Orr v. Southern Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Crider v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Holloman v. Southland Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Von Schmidt v. Noland Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morman v. PritchardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Rose v. MAYOR &C. OF THUNDERBOLTCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API