Legal Opinion

Wray v. Mooneyham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 6, 1995No. 1931519Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSTON, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Billie H. Wray and Laquita 0. Wray, appeal from a summary judgment for the defendants, Joe Mooneyham and Jack Mooneyham, in this action seeking damages for trespass. We affirm.

This is the second time these parties have been before this Court. See Wray v. Moo-neyham, 589 So.2d 181 (Ala.1991) ('Wray I), for a better understanding of the facts surrounding this case. Basically, it is undisputed that the Mooneyhams and the Wrays own coterminous tracts of land and that the boundary runs roughly north to south along what is known as the “Cherokee Indian boundary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. CITY OF HUNTSVILLE ELEC. UTILITY BD.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Wray v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API