Legal Opinion
United States v. Rudaj
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 3, 2005No. 04 CR.1110 DLCPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COTE, District Judge.
Defendant Alex Rudaj (“Rudaj”) has moved to suppress evidence seized without a warrant from his home on the morning of his arrest. A hearing was held on September 7, 2005. For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part.
Background
At the hearing, the Government called two agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to testify. The defendant did not testify. The following constitutes this Court’s findings of fact.
On October 26, 2004, a team of agents from the FBI arrived at the large, single-family house where Rudaj and his family lived…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Deanda v. HicksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. GrazianoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- United States v. FadulDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. JamesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Borisova v. FribergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.