Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNbokNe, J.

The record and case on appeal as to both defendants has been duly docketed in this Court. But defendant J. B. Brown has failed to file brief as required by Rule 27 of Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 562. Such failure works an abandonment of his assignments of error, except those appearing upon the face of the record, which are cognizable ex mero motu. See S. v. Robinson, 214 N.C. 365, 199 S.E. 270, where authorities are assembled. However, as to defendant J. B. Brown, error does not appear upon the face of the record. Indeed, his counsel expressly states that he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collingwood v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Turnage v. McLawhonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Land v. LandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API