Legal Opinion

Davis v. Drackett Products Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 15, 1982No. C-1-76-60PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPIEGEL, District Judge:

This action is before this Court on defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (doc. 51), plaintiffs’ memorandum in opposition (doc. 59), and defendants’ reply (doc. 60). For the reasons outlined below defendants’ motion is granted, however, as set forth below, the remaining plaintiff, minor, Daniel Allen Davis is granted leave to amend his complaint.

The facts necessary to deciding this motion are relatively simple. Daniel Allen Davis, a minor, on or about November 12,1968 came in contact with a product commonly known as Drano. Defendants produce and market…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Clutter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Kraut v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boley v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Roberts v. Western-Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. PepperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Lasselle v. Special Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API