Legal Opinion

Borden v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1990No. A90A0599PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Chief Judge.

After appellant-plaintiff was discharged as appellee-defendants’ at-will employee, she brought this tort action based upon allegations that her employment had been terminated because of her pregnancy. Appellees answered, denying the material allegations of appellant’s complaint, and they subsequently moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees and appellant appeals.

1. Appellant urges that a genuine issue of material fact remains as to her tort claim for the “wrongful” termination of her employment. However, “[a]n employee,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. L. Williams & Associates v. FairclothSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Evans v. Bibb CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Troy v. Interfinancial, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Goodroe v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Lane v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Phinazee v. Interstate Nationalease, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Reilly v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Fink v. DoddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API