Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Lopez-Brignoni
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentRothenberg, J.
INTRODUCTION
While I agree with the bulk of the majority’s opinion, I respectfully disagree with its analysis in section II.B approving the damages methodology advanced by the homeowners. The majority correctly notes that the determination regarding the proper measure of damages is dictated by the facts and circumstances of each case, *1144Dep’t of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Bogorff, 35 So.3d 84, 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); the “replacement cost” methodology has been approved as a measure of damages in cases where trees are removed from real property, id.; Fla. Dep’t of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Leonard J. Klay v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Mercury Motors Exp., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.