Legal Opinion
People v. Sharpe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]), which permitted the prosecutor to question the defendant, were he to testify, on the underlying facts of two of his prior convictions and as to the existence, among others, of two prior felony convictions, was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see People v Stapleton, 41 AD3d 744 [2007]; People v McLaurin, 33 AD3d 819, 819-820 [2006]; People v Myron, 28 AD3d 681, 683 [2006], cert denied 549 US 1326 [2007]; cf. People v Hayes, 97 NY2d 203, 207-208 [2002]).
The defendant contends that the evidence was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WhitlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SandovalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CantaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. SandovalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012