Legal Opinion

Reinke v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 2000No. 1D99-3694PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Mary Reinke, appellant, contends that the trial court erred in entering a cost judgment against her, because more than eight months had expired since entry of the final judgment before appellee, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., filed its motion to tax costs as a prevailing party. We affirm.

On October 2, 1998, following the return of a jury verdict finding defendant Wal-Mart not liable in a personal-injury action brought by Reinke, the trial court entered judgment thereon and reserved jurisdiction for taxation of costs. Reinke did not appeal. Eight months later, on June 4, 1999, Wal-Mart filed a motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. AskewSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. Oriental Imports, Inc. v. AlilinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Dragstrem v. ButtsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Governing Bd. of St. Johns River Water Management Dist. v. Lake Pickett Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tesla Electric, Armature & Machine, Inc. v. JLM Advanced Technical Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API