Reinke v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Mary Reinke, appellant, contends that the trial court erred in entering a cost judgment against her, because more than eight months had expired since entry of the final judgment before appellee, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., filed its motion to tax costs as a prevailing party. We affirm.
On October 2, 1998, following the return of a jury verdict finding defendant Wal-Mart not liable in a personal-injury action brought by Reinke, the trial court entered judgment thereon and reserved jurisdiction for taxation of costs. Reinke did not appeal. Eight months later, on June 4, 1999, Wal-Mart filed a motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roberts v. AskewSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Oriental Imports, Inc. v. AlilinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Dragstrem v. ButtsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Governing Bd. of St. Johns River Water Management Dist. v. Lake Pickett Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tesla Electric, Armature & Machine, Inc. v. JLM Advanced Technical Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013