Legal Opinion

In Re Tatum

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 10, 1979No. Bankruptcy 2-79-02980PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION

R. J. SIDMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the Court with respect to the requested confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan proposed by Robert Lee Tatum. The terms of the plan, as amended, are the payment of $58.00 bi-weekly from the debtor’s future wages, the payment of all allowed claims in full, and the payment of three partially secured creditors, Beneficial Finance Company, Columbus Municipal Employees Credit Union, and Ohio Teachers Credit Union, outside the plan.

This Court has previously ruled upon the permissibility of the payment of partially secured…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. In the Matter of John W. Foster, Jr. And Myrtha D. Foster, Debtors. John W. Foster, Jr., and Myrtha D. Foster v. William Heitkamp, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. In Re CaseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1981
  4. Overholt v. Farm Credit Services (In Re Overholt)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  5. In Re SutherlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API