Coleman v. . McCullough

The plaintiff rests her appeal upon two contentions: (1) That under Judge McElroy’s order remanding the cause she had a legal right to be heard and to introduce evidence before the referee, and that *592baying been denied tbis privilege sbe bad a legal right either to a reference or to a reasonable time for filing exceptions. (2) That sbe was entitled to a rereference or to an opportunity for filing exceptions on the ground of excusable neglect or surprise under C. S., 600. It appears, then, that the plaintiffs exceptions depend primarily, if not exclusively, upon the purpose and effect of Judge…