Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 6, 1934No. Docket No. 28708Published

Held, that oil and gas royalties received in the taxable year by petitioner, a married woman residing in Texas, from lands situated in Oklahoma, in the mineral rights of which she owned a beneficial interest as a member of the Osage Tribe of Indians, constituted her separate income.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSALIE HAMPTON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Hampton v. Commissioner

Docket No. 28708.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

31 B.T.A. 853; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1025;

December 6, 1934, Promulgated

Held, that oil and gas royalties received in the taxable year by petitioner, a married woman residing in Texas, from lands situated in Oklahoma, in the mineral rights of which she owned a beneficial interest as a member of the Osage Tribe of Indians, constituted her separate income.

Thomas J. Reilly, Esq., for the petitioner.

O. W. Swecker, Esq., for the respondent.

TRAMMELL

OPINION.

TRA…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API