In re Crosby Fisheries, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
Claimant cites in support of his motion Carlisle Packing Co. v. Sandanger, supra; The Lotta (D. C.) 150 F. 219; Delaware River Ferry Co. v. Amos (D. C.) 179 F. 756; The Eureka No. 32 (D. C.) 108 F. 672; The Rosa (D. C.) 53 F. 132; The Great Western, 118 U. S. 520, 6 S. Ct. 1172, 30 L. Ed. 156; The Scotland, 105 U. S. 24, 26 L. Ed. 1001; and Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific, 273 U. S. 207, 47 S. Ct. 357, 71 L. Ed. 612, in which Chief Justice Taft said, at page 216 of 273 U. S. (47 S. Ct. 359):
“The proceeding partakes in a way of the features of a bill…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Norwich Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The MurielDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928