Legal Opinion
PlaSmart, Inc. v. Wincell International Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 7, 2006No. 05 Civ. 10745(PKC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CASTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff PlaSmart Inc. brings this action against defendants Wincell International Inc., Jar Chen Wang, and Hong Jiun Gu, asserting five causes of action. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that its product, the PlasmaCar, does not infringe certain patents alleged to be held by defendants, and/or a declaration that those patents are invalid or unenforceable. Plaintiff also asserts causes of action for trade dress infringement, tortious interference with business relations and trade libel.
Defendants have answered and defendants Wincell and Wang…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cross-Appellant v. mcneil-p.p.c., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Contech Stormwater Solutions, Inc. v. Baysaver Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Road Dawgs Motorcycle Club of the United States, Inc. v. "CUSE" Road Dawgs, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Enduracoat Technologies, Inc. v. Watson Bowman Acme Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- George & Company LLC v. Spin Master US Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020