Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crawford v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 19, 2000No. Record 0683-99-1Published

1DissentBumgardner, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I conclude the instruction correctly stated the law applicable to DNA evidence. It properly instructed the jurors on the legal principles, so they could apply that law to the evidence before them.

A court confronts two distinct considerations when a new scientific discovery is first offered to prove a fact. The first consideration is whether the newly discovered scientific principle is authentic. The second consideration is whether the scientific principle was applied properly to the particular circumstances of the case. The first inquiry tests the validity of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Satcher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  2. Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Nelms v. NelmsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. Oliver v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  5. New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API