Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1933No. Docket No. 9107Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.

[1] The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner's attachment (TruckOwners Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [228 P. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. SuperiorCourt, 8 Cal.App. 622 [97 P. 681]; People v. San Diego,71 Cal.App. 421 [236 P. 377]).

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Dahlgren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. People v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925