Legal Opinion
United States v. Boris Granik, Alexander Iskolsky, and Semyon Bumagin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 15, 2004No. Docket 02-1523PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge.
Semyon Bumagin appeals from his conviction and sentence after pleading guilty before Judge Wood. Bumagin was involved in a scheme to defraud a jeweler and pled guilty to conspiring to possess and pass a counterfeit instrument to defraud a jeweler, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 513(a), 514(a)(2) and to passing or attempting to pass a fictitious obligation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 514(a)(2). In his plea agreement, Bumagin stipulated that the offenses “involved a loss or attempted loss” between $500,000 and $800,000. On appeal, Bumagin contends that the district…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Dennis L. WengerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. ThornsburyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. ArevaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. HamdiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jerome E. RosenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Yooho WeonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.