Legal Opinion

Sturdevant v. Erie-Lackawanna Railroad

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1970No. Civ. A. Nos. 36, 97-69 EriePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERALD J. WEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiff in C.A. 36-69 Érie above, a cause of action arising out of a grade crossing accident brought here under diversity jurisdiction, seeks production under F.R.Civ.P. 34 of defendant railroad’s reports of investigations of prior accidents at this crossing. The existence and custody of these reports were established by answers to interrogatories and plaintiff has no other means of securing them.

Defendant’s objections are that the mere fact that other accidents took place at this location is not admissible and the production of these reports would not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Stormer v. Alberts Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Richard D. Difrischia v. New York Central Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  4. Hammill v. Hyster Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1967
  5. Stubler v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Uitts v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API