Blasingame v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTSON, Justice.
The conviction is for official oppression. Trial was to the court on a plea of not guilty; punishment was confinement which was probated and a fine. Issues on appeal are the sufficiency of the indictment and the evidence. We reverse.
Omitting its formal parts, the indictment alleged that on July 27, 1984 appellant did:
while a public servant, namely, the May- or of Jacinto City, Texas, and while acting under color of his office and employment, intentionally subject ELIZABETH TARTALI, hereafter styled the Complainant, to mistreatment by threatening to commit a felony,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Mizell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- Bryson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Kenneth and Dawn Deschler v. Girish Vallabhan, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Patrick Hang Tran v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Patrick Hang Tran v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001