Legal Opinion
Michael Francis Slavik v. Watson B. Miller, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 30, 1950No. 10208PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The court below, 89 F.Supp. 575, lacked jurisdiction of the person of the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization and hence acquired no power to adjudicate the issues. We ruled to this effect in Podovinnikoff v. Miller, 3 Cir., 179 F.2d 937. See also Connor v. Miller, 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 755. It follows that the court below committed no error in entering the order complained of. Accordingly it will be affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Connor v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Podovinnikoff v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Slavik v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chung Young Chew v. John P. Boyd, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice, Seattle DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Rodriguez v. LandonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- De Pinho Vaz v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Birns v. Commissioner of Immigration and NaturalizationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
- Corona v. LandonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.