Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re the Marriage of Neville

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1996No. CC DR93-0688; CA A85354; SC S42810Published

1ConcurrenceFadeley, J.

I concur in the dismissal of this case as one in which review was improvidently allowed, because the issue that petitioner on review wants this court to address was not raised in the trial court or argued to the Court of Appeals. This concurrence expresses my somewhat differing reasons for why the decision of the Court of Appeals, reversing the circuit court and remanding the case to that court, is correct.

In this child visitation case, the issue is whether the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA, or Act) permits an Oregon court to avoid exercising jurisdiction over a child…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Marriage of SettleOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Matter of Custody of RossOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Dennis v. DennisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Stubbs v. WeathersbyOregon Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API