Legal Opinion
Vizio, Inc. v. Navigators Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 29, 2021No. 2:20-cv-06864Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 VIZIO, INC., Case № 2:20-CV-06864-ODW (ASx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING 13 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 14 ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, DISMISS [63] 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Vizio, Inc. initiated this action against Arch Insurance Company and 19 Navigators Insurance Company (together, “Defendants”) based on its claim that 20 Defendants failed to provide benefits pursuant to the terms of their primary and excess 21 insurance policies. (See generally First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 27.) On 22…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.