Legal Opinion

Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 6, 1982No. 17360PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Londrigan

Plaintiff, the wife of an asbestos worker who contracted asbestosis, sued defendant, North American Asbestos Corporation, for loss of consortium on theories of strict liability and wilful and wanton negligence. Judgment was entered on the jury’s verdict awarding plaintiff $125,000 in compensatory and $375,000 in punitive damages, and defendant appeals.

Plaintiff’s husband, Charles Hammond, was employed by Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO) from 1953 until 1971. During this time Hammond contracted respiratory diseases and asbestosis, which is a chronic, degenerative condition caused by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Betts v. Manville Personal Injury Settlement TrustAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Cappiello v. Ragen Precision Indus., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Menna v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API