Legal Opinion

Georgia Northeastern Railroad v. Lusk

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 2004No. A02A1305Published

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

In Division 2 of Ga. Northeastern R. Co. v. Lusk, 258 Ga. App. 742 (574 SE2d 810) (2002), we affirmed the sum awarded as damages to Larry Lusk in this nuisance action, holding that the estimated cost to restore Lusk’s eroded riverbank was a proper measure of damages. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether the damages awarded constituted an impermissible double recovery and whether cost to repair or restore land is an appropriate measure of damages when that cost is disproportionate to the diminution in value. In Ga. Northeastern R. Co. v. Lusk, 277 Ga. 245 (587…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. GEORGIA NORTHEASTERN R. CO., INC. v. LuskSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. GEORGIA NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD CO. v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API