Legal Opinion

United States v. Patrick Williams

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2007No. 05-5460PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Chief Judge.

Patrick Williams moved to suppress two pieces of evidence before his trial on charges of possessing an illegal and unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), and with being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). First, he argued that his statement that he had a gun under his mattress is inadmissible because it resulted from a custodial interrogation conducted absent the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Second, he argued that the gun itself is inadmissible because…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. United States v. TejadaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. LiddellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. Ferrell, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Portage County2017
  5. United States v. MikolonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API