Mead v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the motions to suppress evidence and statements filed by the de- ■ fendant were properly denied in the trial court as the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant Dixon v. State, 343 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Berry v. State, 316 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), and probable cause to search the defendant’s vehicle; Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925), adopted by § 933.19, Fla.Stat. (1979); McGowan v. State, 351 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), based on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- State v. CumbieSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Berry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Kidwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Blunt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. WilliamsCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1985