Barnes v. Bamberg
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aldrich, J., Bamberg, December, 1898. Application for rule to- show cause by plaintiff, in J. W. Barnes v. W..H. Bamberg. From order refusing rule, the plaintiff appeals.
Read the full summary
Before Aldrich, J., Bamberg, December, 1898. Application for rule to- show cause by plaintiff, in J. W. Barnes v. W..H. Bamberg. From order refusing rule, the plaintiff appeals. Mr. Bostick and Mr. Bellinger cité: On main question: Rev. Stat, 2512, 2517 to 2520; 31 S. C., 22Ó; Sease v. Dobson, 34 S. C.; Mauldin v. Gossett, 15 S. C. Substantial rights involving law and fact have been determined under rule to show cause: Trenholm v. Wilson, 13 S. C.; Charles v. Wilson, Ibid.; Douglass v. Craig, Ibid.; 46 S. C., 114; 2 McM., 150; Oliver v. Sale, 19 S. C. cites: This remedy not exclusive: 24 S.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
This is a proceeding to enforce a landlord’s lien for rent, and was commenced by the issuance of a warrant of attachment by the Clerk of Court based upon an affidavit and an undertaking as required by law. Under this warrant, the sheriff seized the crops or agricultural products subject to the lien for rent. Then, pursuant to sec. 2522, Revised Statutes, lienee, Bamberg, in order to-regain possession of the property, entered into a bond or undertaking, with sureties, “for the delivery of said property to the said J. W. Barnes, if such…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Volunteer State Life Insurance v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Lightsey v. RentzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Plumley v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932