Legal Opinion
Wilma Miller, Doing Business as Double Diamond Construction v. Mills Construction, Inc. Van Tol Surety Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2003No. 02-3793PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
Wilma Miller, doing business as Double Diamond Construction (“Double Diamond”), filed suit against Mills Construction, Inc. (“Mills”) and its surety, Van Tol Surety Co., Inc. (“Van Tol”), alleging that Mills failed to compensate Double Diamond for work performed under a subcontract between Double Diamond and Mills. The district court found in favor of Double Diamond in the amount of $83,723 and awarded prejudgment interest in the amount of $33,504.93. Mills and Van Tol appeal. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Mills, a general contractor in Brookings, South Dakota, contracted with the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Murphy v. ImplicitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- KRANTZ, INC. v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2005
- Soicher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Lincoln Farm, L.L.C. v. OppligerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- 3511 13th Street Tenants' Ass'n v. 3511 13th Street, N.W. Residences, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.