Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Patrick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 4, 1988No. 86-2605, 86-3477PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE LORENZ

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal of the denial of defendants’ post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in an action for damages as a result of an accident in which a semitractor-trailer collided with plaintiff’s automobile. Defendants also appeal the denial of two other post-trial motions brought pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 305 (107 Ill. 2d R. 305) which sought to stay enforcement of the judgment rendered at trial pending appeal.

We affirm. The following is pertinent to our disposition.

Plaintiff, Danny Forrester, filed a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Churchill v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Richichi v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Magnani v. TrogiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. LaGrange Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Rock River Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Wills v. PaulAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Knauerhaze v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Zirp-Burnham, LLC v. E. Terrell Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Marek v. StepkowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Kresin v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Eaglin v. Cook County HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API