Legal Opinion

Mulligan v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 4, 2013No. 4D12-2555PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

Appellant challenges a final order dismissing her amended complaint against State Farm, her insurance company, with prejudice. The trial court granted State Farm’s motion to dismiss, which argued that the statute of limitations had expired on the action. Appellant had filed no written response to the motion and did not appear at the hearing. Although, in its order dismissing the complaint, the trial court noted that appellant’s attorney did not appear at the hearing, it did not enter a dismissal because of the non-appearance.1 It granted the motion with preju*853dice. Therefore, we conclude that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aills v. BoemiSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Vorbeck v. BetancourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. DiSarrio v. MillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Acosta v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. v. TepperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SERGIO R. FERNANDEZ v. MIRIAM FERNANDEZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  2. Tigran Abrahamyan v. Lilya ArakelyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API