Mulligan v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
Appellant challenges a final order dismissing her amended complaint against State Farm, her insurance company, with prejudice. The trial court granted State Farm’s motion to dismiss, which argued that the statute of limitations had expired on the action. Appellant had filed no written response to the motion and did not appear at the hearing. Although, in its order dismissing the complaint, the trial court noted that appellant’s attorney did not appear at the hearing, it did not enter a dismissal because of the non-appearance.1 It granted the motion with preju*853dice. Therefore, we conclude that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aills v. BoemiSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Vorbeck v. BetancourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- DiSarrio v. MillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Acosta v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. v. TepperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- SERGIO R. FERNANDEZ v. MIRIAM FERNANDEZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- Tigran Abrahamyan v. Lilya ArakelyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025