Legal Opinion
Vo v. Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 20, 2022No. 6:22-cv-00685Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON QUANG VO, Petitioner, Case. No. 6:22-cv-685-MC v. OPINION AND ORDER OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOBS AND FAMILY SERVICES (WARREN COUNTY CHILDREN SERVICES), Respondent. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Petitioner Quang Vo, proceeding pro se, filed a “Petition for Confirmation, Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award.” Petitioner did not pay the filing fee and did not move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner is apparently unhappy with a custody decision rendered by Respondent. Petitioner unilaterally drafted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Arizona Students' Ass'n v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.