Legal Opinion

Wright v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1923No. Civ. No. 4465PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.

This case is almost identical with that of Rockridge Place Co. v. City of Oakland, 61 Cal. App. 791 [216 Pac. 64]. The cases were tried together upon substantially the same facts, and both involve the same points of law.

The court gave plaintiff judgment against defendant in the sum of two thousand dollars. As in the companion case, the appeal comes up on the judgment-roll alone.

In this case, however, the trial court -found facts additional to those narrated in the Roekridge Company case. It found that plaintiff did not in fact know of the actual performance of the work until it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rockridge Place Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Borough of Totowa v. American Surety Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API