Legal Opinion

Winans v. W.A.S., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 1, 1988No. 19970-6-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.

W.A.S., Inc., d/b/a Henry's Off Broadway (Henry's), appeals from a judgment in which the court found that Henry's compensation method for its automobile parking valets violated the Fair Labor Standards Act. Henry's also appeals the award of attorneys' fees and costs. Winans and five other valets (hereafter valets) cross-appeal the denial of liquidated damages.

Henry's employed a number of valets in its restaurant business. Its employment contract with the valets included an agreement that designated all tips collected by valets as the property of Henry's. Henry's paid the valets an hourly wage…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schumacher Painting Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Winans v. W.A.S., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bank of the West v. BurlingameCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Winans v. W.A.S., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API