State Highway Department v. Respess
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Presiding Judge.
The first question for decision is whether the trial court erred in overruling the condemnor’s special demurrer and motion to purge a paragraph of the condemnee’s answer wherein he alleged that he was attaching as exhibits three appraisals of the property being condemned. Whether such pleadings were subject to demurrer need not be passed upon under a proper construction of the statutes dealing with eminent domain.
Under the Act of 1961 (Ga. L. 1961, p. 517 et seq.; Code Ann. Ch. 36-13), the issue as to value is not made by an answer filed by the condemnee to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chandler v. Alabama Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Alabama Power Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- State Highway Department v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Highway Department v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Pye v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Nunnery v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- State Highway Department v. RespessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- State Highway Department v. RespessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.