State v. Franklin

OPINION

OROZCO, Judge.

¶ 1 Martell Darren Franklin (Defendant) appeals his convictions and sentences for disorderly conduct, a class six felony; assault, a class one misdemeanor; and unlawful imprisonment, a class six felony. Defendant alleges that the trial court erred when it admitted *558hearsay interview statements under the forfeiture by wrongdoing exception of Arizona Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6).1 He also alleges that admitting those statements violated his right to confront his accuser under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We find that the trial court did not err and…