LoCastro v. Ruane

COBB, Judge.

Appellees, James J. Ruane and James P. Ruane (father and son), sued the appellant, Frank LoCastro, for damages incurred as a result of renovations they made to LoCas-tro’s restaurant building. On appeal, Lo-Castro challenges the jury verdict for $28,-000 for James P. Ruane on the basis that it was improperly predicated upon guesswork and speculation.1

*501LoCastro argues that despite James P. Ruane’s testimony at trial and deposition that he had receipts and cancelled checks to prove all of his expenditures during renovation, the total amount of the documentation introduced into…