Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Campbell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2006No. 2004AP803-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.

¶ 84. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I join that portion of the majority opinion which affirms the judgments of conviction in this case. I write separately because I strongly disagree with the majority's conclusion that a circuit court has the authority to impose attorney fees for standby counsel as a condition of a defendant's probation. Majority op., part III D, ¶¶ 63-80. I therefore dissent from that portion of the opinion.

I. ¶ 85. During his continued initial appearance on June 19, 2001,1 defendant John Campbell (Campbell) appeared pro se, having filed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. KlessigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Douglas County v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Moore v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API