Legal Opinion

Kalbfleisch v. Perkins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1937No. Docket No. 70, Calendar No. 39,575PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of LeRoy E. Kalbfleisch, deceased, sued defendant to recover damages resulting from the death of plaintiff’s decedent who died as a result of an automobile highway crossing collision. Prom judgment for plaintiff for $3,500 damages,' and costs, defendant appeals, alleging 14 reasons why the judgment of the trial court should be reversed.

The tenth reason relied upon by defendant for reversal is:

“Because the defendant, Bert Perkins, was not allowed, in objection of plaintiff’s attorney and the ruling of the court thereon, to testify to the following :
“…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Noonan v. VolekMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Foote v. HuelsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Buchel v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hanna v. McClaveMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Richardson v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schillinger v. WymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Leitelt Iron Works Ex Rel. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. De VriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Young v. GroenendalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Black v. AmbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bolser v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API