Legal Opinion

Kneib v. People

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by certiorari from a conviction at the special sessions.

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

— The plaintiff in error was charged with keeping and exposing for sale adulterated milk, convicted and fined $100. It does not appear from the .complaint made whether he was to be prosecuted under the act of 1864 (chap. 544, sec. 1) or under the rules and regulations established by the board of health, under the act of 1866 (Laws of 1866, vol. 1, p. 138, sec. 20) and the acts amendatory thereof passed in 1867 and 1874 (Laws of 1867, .chap. 956, sec. 10; Laws *141of 1874, chap. 630, sec. 15). The act of 1864 requires that the offender should have knowledge of the adulteration. There was no charge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harker v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pressel v. FerrisNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wolfe v. AbbottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. People v. Hall, New York County Courts1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API