Flanagan v. Fox
City of New York Municipal Court
Appeal from a judgment, entered upon the verdict of a jury on the 7tli day of February, 1893, in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $723.21, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The facts will sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrowN, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for a breach of contract on the part of the defendant. On the —. *366day of June, 1892, the above-named defendant, as vendor, entered into a contract in writing with Catharine Flanagan (now deceased), as vendee, in and by which the defendant agreed to sell to the said Catharine Flanagan a lot of land in the city of ¡New York, for the sum of $6,000, $500 to be paid on the signing of the contract (which was then paid), $3,500 on delivery of the deed, and the remaining sum of $2,000 by the execution of a purchase-money mortgage by the said Catharine Flanagan;…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Brooklyn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Vought v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Folliard v. WallaceNew York Supreme Court · 1807
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flanagan v. FoxNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Flanagan v. FoxCity of New York Municipal Court · 1893
- Simmons v. ZimmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904