Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Alan Louis Chavis and Lambert Daniel Slisz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1985No. 84-1305PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

Treating the suggestions for rehearing en banc as petitions for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petitions for panel rehearing are DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestions for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.

The panel opinion issued July 1, 1985, is withdrawn and the following opinion is issued in its place.

Alan Louis Chavis and Lambert Daniel Slisz attack their convictions for mail…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Lichenstein and Leo BellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Sidney Levine and Mpd Film Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Dante Angelo Grassi and Jack Louis GailCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. John RuppelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. James C. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Shirley Maggitt and Tommy MaggittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. James BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API