Legal Opinion

People v. Romanski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 28, 1987No. 3—86—0575PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

As a result of statements made during his closing argument before a jury, attorney Henry Romanski was found guilty of contempt. He was also fined and placed on conditional discharge for one year. Upon review of the record, we are unable to find that Romanski’s actions were contemptuous. Therefore, we reverse.

On September 26, 1985, Romanski was representing Joseph Malone in a jury trial in Peoria County. Prior to closing arguments, the assistant State’s Attorney submitted a motion in limine. He sought to prohibit any argument during closing statements which would inform the jury that a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reidelberger v. Highland Body Shop, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. SiegelIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. BernardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Allen v. DuffieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Grady v. Cook County Sheriff's Merit BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Romanski v. BarraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API