Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Sanchez

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1942No. Criminal No. 920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— Prank Sanchez and George Eredia were jointly informed against for the crime of rape, jointly tried and convicted, and have appealed to this court.

The assignments of error, four in number, are all directed at the rulings of the court in the course of the trial and at the court’s order overruling appellants’ motion for “a new trial because of the passion and prejudice of the trial jury.” The assignments are as follows:

“1. The court erred in refusing to grant a severance in the trial of this case.

‘ ‘ 2. The court erred in admitting in evidence a certain confession made by George Eredia, one of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. State v. MacLarenOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. . KirklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. State v. KirklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GoodyearArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. State v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cavanagh v. Ohio Farmers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. State of Arizona v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API