Legal Opinion

Estate of Rittenhouse

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1976No. 210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANDERINO, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue of whether the surviving spouse’s share of her deceased husband’s estate is liable for the payment of administration expenses when she elects to take against the will pursuant to the Wills Act of April 24, 1947, P.L. 89, § 8, as amended, 20 P.S. § 180.8, now 20 Pa.C.S.A. § 2508.

The testator, Roy H. Rittenhouse, died in August of 1970. When his will was offered for probate, appellant Emma H. Rittenhouse chose to take against the will under § 2508. Section 2508(b) states:

“The surviving spouse, upon an election to take against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beeruk EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Brown EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Pratt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Neamand EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FleegerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Estate of GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Lewis Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API