Legal Opinion

Katko v. Balcerzak

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1987No. 87AP-347PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.

Plaintiff, John A. Katko, Jr., appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas contending that that court erred in dismissing his complaint, but fails to set forth a specific assignment of error and, instead, has set forth the following issue presented for review (which we shall consider to be his assignment of error):

“Did the documentation filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Stanley P. Balcerzak, M.D. demonstrate that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the defendant Dr. Balcerzak was employed by the State of Ohio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Von Hoene v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Smith v. StempelOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Torpey v. State, Dept. of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Moss v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Theobald v. University of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Theobald v. University of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Norman v. Ohio State University HospitalsOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Balson v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Latham v. Ohio State University HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API