Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Freedman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 13, 1979No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 23, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The Attorney Grievance Commission, through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9 against Michael Alvin Freedman, alleging violations of the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The matter was referred to Judge Martin B. Greenfeld of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. After conducting a hearing and considering the petition, answer, respondent’s answer to the Commission’s request for admission of facts and genuineness of documents and a letter from the United States…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Attorney Griev. Comm'n of Maryland v. Franz & LipowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. JeterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mba-JonasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API