Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Riffle

District Court, D. Indiana

Decided May 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gresham, D. J.

The plaintiff in this suit seeks to be subrogated to the benefit of a mortgage and have it foreclosed. George W. Riffle and George Westfall executed their joint note to Lampson Reed, for $1,000, payable in 12 months. Westfall was Riffle’s surety, and to save him harmless the latter executed the mortgage sought to, be foreclosed. This mortgage was duly recorded on the eighteenth day of June, 1877. On the eleventh day of July, 1877 Abraham Ackerland and Lewis Wyler obtained judgment in this court against Riffle for $1,000, and on the twenty-first of February, 1878, Riffle sold and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bales v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Hefner v. VandolahIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Palmer v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Rice v. DeweyNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  2. Rogers v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API