Legal Opinion

Brogan v. Tunkhannock Twp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 2018No. 3:14–CV–1690PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 96) by Magistrate Judge Carlson, in which he recommends that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 56) and motion for summary judgment (Doc. 75) by Defendants Tunkhannock Township and Officer Zdaniewicz be treated as a motion for summary judgment and that the motions be granted and summary judgment be entered in favor of these defendants. Plaintiff Patrick Brogan has filed Objections (Doc. 97) to the Magistrate Judge's R & R and a brief in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ATKINS v. HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAUDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. Dimoff v. Chambersburg Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Gelbutis v. Shenandoah Police DepartmentDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API