In re the Detention of Martin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 The State committed Sheldon Martin as a sexually violent predator based on two sexually violent offenses he committed in Oregon. Washington’s sexually violent predator law (ch. 71.09 RCW) includes out-of-state convictions of sexually violent offenses as a basis for a commitment petition but authorizes only a specific prosecutor to file the petition: “the prosecuting attorney of the county where the person was convicted or charged or the attorney general if requested by the prosecuting attorney . . . ,”1 The superior court denied Martin’s motion to dismiss the petition for want of statutory…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. SweanyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Rivas v. Overlake Hosp. Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- SEIU HEALTHCARE 775NW v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Detention of StrandWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Detention of StrandWashington Supreme Court · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.