Legal Opinion

Fatherree v. Griffin

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1929No. 27560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGtbiepith, J.

Appellants sued appellee on an open account for lumber sold and delivered; the deliveries covering a period of some five or six months. The sworn account exhibited with the declaration was not sufficiently itemized, and, on motion, a bill of particulars was ordered and was filed. To this sworn bill of particulars the defendant filed his counter-affidavit, the material part of the language of which is as follows: ‘ ‘ That each and every item on both of said accounts shown as charges against this defendant are incorrect. ’ ’

The counter-affidavit does not particularize wherein the sworn account…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoye v. Newton Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. State Ex Rel. Murdock Acceptance Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. GoldstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API